The way things have been, a fuel tax of 18.4 cents per gallon of gasoline and 24.4 cents of diesel fuel has been used for the Highway Trust Fund. These numbers, unchanged since 1993, are not enough for the infrastructure needs of the country. The American Civil Society of Engineers says there is a backlog of $661 billion in road repair to be done, and the number only increases each year as the government spends less than the annual wear and tear done to the roads.
The basis for the fuel tax is sound: driving more uses more fuel, which means the user pays more for utilizing more road. Some suggest a similar program called the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax, but that may cost too much money to be an ideal investment.
The American Transport Research Institute (ATRI) conducted an analysis of a VMT tax in 2020. Simply put, they find any method of implementing the program to be impractical.
To start, simply putting down miles on an odometer come tax time is prone to “evasion and noncompliance”, so the ATRI says the best possible current method is to have each vehicle have an electronic device that transmits miles traveled. Implementing such a program would require retrofitting approximately 272 million vehicles, with some drivers having vehicles that are simply too archaic to even have the technology installed.
ATRI says the administrative costs of this system would be too much; it estimates that for every dollar collected, 40 cents would be spent in having people analyze the numbers and collect the money. ATRI says this is 300 times more than the fuel tax system, where collection costs for each dollar are a fraction of a penny.
In short, the ATRI says that a VMT tax would not only make more work for citizens, but would also cost $4.3 billion annually to run. Saving that much money and pumping it back into infrastructure would help pay the backlog much more efficiently.
In a previous article, we suggested a tax added to vehicular maintenance, with the same philosophy as the fuel tax that vehicles driven more would likely need more repair. While the ATRI did not give this any thought, their conclusion of collection costs and inefficiencies for the VMT tax would most likely be the same for maintenance taxes.
It appears the best solution is to bite the bullet and raise fuel taxes. If the 77% jump for inflation from 1993 to today is too bitter of a pill to swallow, the federal government can slowly catch up to inflation by adding more than the rate of inflation until it is caught up.
Things get messy when factoring in alternative fuel vehicles, especially electric cars. Having these vehicles charged at public stations can allow a similar fuel tax, such as 1 cent per kilowatt-hour, and follow the same basic premise and minimal costs of collection as the fuel tax does.
Top Trucking Articles of the Past Year
- Biden’s First 100 Days and How it May Affect Trucking
- FMCSA Considers 5/5 Sleeper Berth Split
- Top 10 Semi-Truck Financing Frequently Asked Questions
- What Are The Different Types of Dump Trucks
- DOT Secretary Elaine Chao Announces Resignation
ABOUT TOPMARK FUNDING
TopMark Funding is a top-rated semi-truck financing and trailer financing company located in Roseville, CA. We specialize in commercial trucking and heavy equipment. Our mission is to become your long-term financial partner by helping you grow your trucking business and fleet.
We’re not here for the short-term, we’re on the long-haul with you!
Learn more about Trailer Financing.
Fill out the contact form or give us a call at (866) 627-6644. One of our truck financing specialists will contact you as soon as possible to go over your truck lease needs and learn more about you and your business financing goals.